 |


One of
my students complained to me recently about the snobbishness he
perceives from jazz and classical musicians. He’s a rocker,
and pretty good at it, and he HATES jazz. But, much to his
credit, he chose to study jazz to expand his abilities, and now he
feels that he’s being disrespected and condescended to by the
other musicians around him.
As a musician who’s always wanted to
do it all, I’ve kept my feet moving through a lot of musical
territory. For the last couple of years, though, a rock band has
been my primary creative outlet because of exactly the sorts of
problems my student is talking about. People in the classical
world and the jazz world can so easily become elitist and snobbish, and
it often seems that their primary goal is finding something wrong with
the music everyone else is making. If you don’t play Bach
exactly the way that the current trends say you should, then
you’re obviously not worthy of respect or serious consideration;
or, if you don’t listen to the right jazz masters and learn to
play the tunes just like they did, then you have no right to play jazz.
I’ve
always been a musical outsider. I am rarely listening to the same
things that my peers are, whether it’s my bandmates in a rock
group or my colleagues at the university. My goal has always been
to put passion and meaning into my music, regardless of the style or
context. I listen to the music I like to hear, and I make the
music I like to make. Research has its place, and so does music
history; but those should never be the focus of music-making.
The essence of music is that it’s
transitory, and the profundity of music depends on it being experienced
now, as it’s happening. Every hearing is new because the
listener is new, and because the moment is new. You can no more
hear the same piece of music twice than you can breathe the same
lungful of air twice – it just doesn’t exist anymore.
The goal is different, of course, when
you’re trying to produce a historical recreation – but the
fact of music’s ethereal nature doesn’t change.
Trying to recreate historical music as it originally sounded is
interesting, edifying, and quite possibly profoundly moving; but it
isn’t the only way to approach the music. And yet performers
often feel that they’re not allowed to do anything new with
classical and jazz material – or, due to years of
hammer-over-the-head musical training, they actually don’t KNOW
how to do anything new. There’s an overwhelming atmosphere
of ancestor-worship that causes the community to look down on anyone
who dares dishonor the memory of the greats by actually having any fun
with their creations.
So, my student doesn’t feel welcome in
the jazz and classical world, and I often feel the same way.
Luckily, it doesn’t have to be this way, and I think the tide is
turning. There seem to be more and more people like me, and like
some of my colleagues, and like many of my students, who don’t
care what the establishment thinks they should do with their art.
I say, let’s respect the masters of the past by learning about
them, and by listening to and studying and loving what they
created. But let’s respect them more, and in a much deeper
way, by making living, breathing music that honors our own
moment. After all, that’s what they were doing – and
that’s why we remember them.
|
|
 |
 |